Fine Print: Cindi is a former co-worker and current friend. She gave me a copy of the book in manuscript form for my own enjoyment, but I decided to share my reaction to the world, or at least post it on this site.
What I’m reading now: “Middlemarch” by George Eliot
Cinthia Ritchie’s agent is currently shopping “Hunger Pangs” around to various publishers. Once it hits a home and makes its way to the shelves, you should check out this literary memoir because the language is beautiful and story haunting.
Readers of the Anchorage Daily News are familiar with Ritchie’s work. She has been an award-winning features writer and columnist for several years. Ritchie has the knack to make the person she’s interviewing alive by noticing small gestures and certain phrases. Ritchie earned her MFA from University of Alaska Anchorage and has published her stories, poetry and essays in a variety of local and national publications. The Rasmuson Foundation awarded her a grant to work on “Hunger Pangs.”
When you read this lyrical work, you might want to have some food nearby. I don’t mean popcorn you can idly snack on. I mean some hardy nourishment, preferably something that will drip and stain on your clothes to remind you that you are not starving yourself like the narrator and her sister, that you are healthy and of sound mind. I craved thick hot chocolate, not the brown, powdered sugar but the kind that will scald your tongue even with whipped cream. Short of that, I ate chocolate chips.
Food plays a central role in this book. Food connects memory and family; food is a way to punish and reward; food is so much more than mashed potatoes and stolen sweets. The book makes me think about my eating habits, my images of myself and food, and my relationship to food. The book does not delve into the cliché of the woman coveting Bon Bons in the closet, but instead presents a horrific image of a girl, several girls, unable to savor food, and in some cases life, because of the stepfather’s abuse of the narrator and her sisters.
The writing is that exquisite kind that makes you realize we haven’t yet lost society to iPods. It is not a skip-through-the-pages easy read. I had to set it down, let myself breathe, read something a little more happy and come back when I was in a better place. But when I did come back, when I was ready, it was as rich and as bitter and as satisfying as quality dark chocolate.
The version I read may not be the one you find in stores, but the story and the hungry, haunting feeling will remain.
The version I read skips around and reads more like an essay than a narrative. Because the narrator is discussing her disjointed childhood and its effects on her now, I think that skipping is warranted and adds an element of craziness that connects us to the story. Not that we don’t just want to hug her, because we do.
One editor complained the book didn’t have resolution, but this is not a tidy book, a blow-dried hair and stilettos book. This is a wild, barefoot, farm-child book and a memoir of a woman who is still working on her own resolution. It would be an injustice to tie this story up with a red ribbon. It is much more satisfying to see her feet bleed in the end and have her kiss a man we may not want her to kiss.
Like with many good books that draw me into their world, I am left wanting more. I want to know more about her son and his father, about other elements in her life. I want to see each family member a little clearer, even Deena whom we know so well and whose death drives the book.